Trending November 2023 # Make Mine Vanilla, Part 1 # Suggested December 2023 # Top 20 Popular

You are reading the article Make Mine Vanilla, Part 1 updated in November 2023 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested December 2023 Make Mine Vanilla, Part 1

Waste Management Inc. has no intention of letting its name be dragged through the dirt by its new ERP system. The $12 billion, Houston-based firm — the largest solid-waste management company in the U.S.–recently began a $100-plus million installation of financial and human resources software from PeopleSoft Inc. of Pleasanton, Calif. It is determined, says Tom Smith, Waste Management’s CIO, to make the new system succeed.

The company’s current, AS/400-based system, had been built completely with proprietary, custom code. One of the keys to making the new system succeed, Waste Management realized, was using the software — as much as possible — just as it came from PeopleSoft.

The risks of installing big-ticket software applications are certainly clear. The complexity of installing enterprise-wide systems has led to some spectacular failures in recent years. High-flying shoemaker Nike Inc. stumbled last quarter, when problems related to a complex installation of supply chain software from i2 Technologies, Inc. forced it to write off $100 million in inventory and miss its sales goals. In the last two years, both Phoenix, Ariz.-based PETsMART, Inc. and Hershey, Penn.-based candy maker Hershey Foods Corp. saw revenues suffer as a result of problems implementing ERP systems from SAP.

At a Glance

The company: Waste Management Inc. is the largest solid-waste management firm in the U.S., Houston-based Waste Management has 57,000 employees and revenues in 2000 of $12.5 billion.

The solution: Use the packaged ERP software “out of the box” as much as possible, keeping modifications to a minimum.

The IT infrastructure: PeopleSoft financials, benefits, time and attendance, and other software, running on IBM RS/6000 servers under AIX, and an Oracle database.

“The lesson learned from failures like Nike is that having to customize complex environments can kill you,” says Joshua Greenbaum, principle of Enterprise Applications Group, in Daly City, Calif.

That’s a lesson that Waste Management is paying careful attention to. After a pilot last December, the company is now rolling out the PeopleSoft software to about 250 of its 1,500 locations each month, and expects to complete the installation by the end of 2001. In the process, it is keeping a tight reign on customizations, intentionally making it difficult for users to modify the system. “Any customizations required need to be approved at a higher level than the team working on it,” explains Smith. “We believe that we will greatly enhance our chances of success by keeping our system very plain vanilla.”

That doesn’t mean Waste Management can avoid customization altogether. The company has modified the PeopleSoft system, for example, to accommodate differences in contracts negotiated with different unions.

But custom programming will not make up a significant part of the total work involved in the project. Smith estimates the changes will make up about only about one percent of the total effort.

Deploying right out of the box

That is exactly what the ERP vendors like to hear. All of the major players encourage their customers to minimize customizations and deploy their software right out of the box whenever possible. For the vendors, simple installations mean less chance of failures that can be both embarrasing and potentially expensive; New York, NY-based clothing manufacturer Warnaco is suing SAP, for example, over a troubled R/3 installation. And it’s much easier for a vendor’s tech support engineers to provide support for standard installations than for ones that have been heavily modified.

To help nudge customers away from customizing their R/3 installations, in mid-1996 SAP introduced a rapid implementation program called AcceleratedSAP (ASAP)–now called ValueSAP–that promised faster, less expensive installations. Oracle’s similar FastForward program and PeopleSoft’s Select (now PeopleSoft Accelerated E-business Solutions) were both introduced in 1997. SAP estimates that 90% of its customers now make some use of its accelerated implementation methodology.

Initially, these rapid implementation programs were a way for the ERP vendors to expand their market to smaller companies, says Katherine Jones, managing director of Collaborative Business Applications at the Aberdeen Group in Boston, Mass. “They had cleaned out the Fortune 1000,” she says, “and they knew they couldn’t sell seven-year rollout plans to mid-market companies.”

The rapid implementation programs, Jones says, let smaller companies–those without programmers on staff to customize applications, or the budget to hire consultants to do the work–install ERP systems. “But now, the vendors are looking at the approach and saying ‘this may not be a bad idea for everyone,’” she says.

And indeed, Waste Management is not the only large company aiming to install ERP applications without extensive customization. GE Power Systems, for example, a $14 billion division of General Electric, is in the process of implementing Oracle’s manufacturing software–without making a single modification–according to Oracle CEO Ellison. That, says Ellison, should enable GE Power Systems to get the first factory up and running within five months of signing the contract.

Over time, ERP products have gained more and more functionality, which makes it easier to install them without customization. Oracle, which entered the application software market in 1987 with Oracle Financials, now sells some 75 different applications covering a broad spectrum of business requirements. SAP offers software specialized for 22 different industries, from paper mills to retail to oil and gas refining; PeopleSoft has tailored its applications for eight vertical markets, including government, education and telecommunications.

The danger with installing software without customization, of course, is that it may not do everything you need it to do. That is a tradeoff vendors, particularly Oracle, are urging their customers to make. “You are better off with an 80% solution installed and working in six months,” Oracle CEO Larry Ellison told users at Oracle’s AppsWorld conference in February, “than fantasizing about a 100% solution that you might finish in two years after you write lots and lots of custom code.”

(Tomorrow, going “vanilla” with your ERP software isn’t a one-scoop deal. Besides getting their initial installs up and running faster, companies are finding that new software upgrades with greater functionality are allowing them to replace some custom code with off-the-shelf software that their ERP vendor, not their in-house IT staff, will support.)

You're reading Make Mine Vanilla, Part 1

Optimizing Apache Performance – Part 1

Apache is an open-source web server implementation, and it is the most popular web server all over the world. Almost 70% of the web servers on the Internet are using Apache. While we can improve Apache server performance by adding additional hardware like RAM, CPU, etc., we can achieve the same result by customizing Apache configuration as well.

This post explains how to improve Apache performance without adding additional hardware resources to your system.

Note: this guide is done on an Ubuntu 14.04 server 14.04.


MaxKeepAliveRequests limits the number of requests allowed per connection. It is used to control persistent connections. In Ubuntu, the default value of MaxKeepAliveRequests is 100. You can change it to any value you desire. The recommended value of MaxKeepAliveRequests is between 50 and 75.

You can change this value by editing the Apache configuration file.









Change the value from 100 to 60.



Save the file and restart Apache.







apache2 restart KeepAliveTimeout

KeepAliveTimeout defines how long the server waits for the new request from connected clients. Setting KeepAliveTimeout to a high value may cause performance issues in a heavily loaded web server. In Ubuntu, the default value of KeepAliveTimeout is 15. The recommended value of KeepAliveTimeout is between 1 and 5.

You can change this value by editing the Apache configuration file.









Change the value from 15 to 3.



Save the file and restart Apache.


It sets the limit on the number of simultaneous connections that will be served. Every new connection request will be queued up after this limit. Once a process is freed, then the queued connection will be served. In Ubuntu, the default MaxClients value is 250. It is recommended to keep this value at 150.

You can change this value by editing the “mpm_prefork.conf” file.











Change the value from 250 to 150.



Save the file and restart Apache.


It is used to recycle processes. When this limit is set to 0, an unlimited amount of requests are allowed per process. MaxConnectionsPerChild sets the limit on the number of requests that an individual child process will handle. After it reaches the specified limit, the child process will die. In Ubuntu, the default MaxConnectionsPerChild value is 100.

The recommended values for this setting are:

virtualized server 300

server with 1-4GB RAM 500

server with 4+GB RAM 1000

You can change this value by editing the “mpm_prefork.conf” file.











Change the value from 100 to 300.



Save the file and restart Apache.


By default, this setting is set to On in Ubuntu. When the Apache server is getting requests from hundreds and thousands of IPs at once, then this setting should be Off. It is recommended to disable this setting to increase connection throughput.

You can disable this setting by editing the Apache configuration file.









Change the value from On to Off.

KeepAlive Off

Save the file and restart Apache.

MinSpareServers and MaxSpareServers

It sets the desired minimum and maximum number of idle child server processes. It controls how many unused child-processes Apache will keep alive while waiting for more requests to put them to use. Each child-process consumes resources, so if you set the MaxSpareServers value too high, then it can cause resource problems.

The recommended values for MinSpareServers are:

virtualized server 5

server with 1-2GB RAM 10

server with 2-4GB RAM 20

server with 4+ GB RAM 25

The recommended values for the MaxSpareServers value should be set as double that of MinSpareServers.

You can change the MinSpareServers value to 5 and the MaxSpareServers value to 10 by editing the “mpm_prefork.conf” file.










mpm_prefork.conf MinSpareServers




Save the file and restart Apache.


Hitesh Jethva

Over 5 years of experience as IT system administrator for IT company in India. My skills include a deep knowledge of Rehat/Centos, Ubuntu nginx and Apache, Mysql, Subversion, Linux, Ubuntu, web hosting, web server, squied proxy, NFS, FTP, DNS, Samba, ldap, Openvpn, Haproxy, Amazon web services, WHMCS, Openstack Cloud, Postfix Mail Server, Security etc.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Sign up for all newsletters.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and European users agree to the data transfer policy. We will not share your data and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Living With An Iphone 3G, Part 1

Is the Apple iPhone 3G “twice as fast at half the price,” as Apple’s marketing boasts? Or is it a slow, faulty, overhyped device that drops calls and doesn’t reliably or consistently connect to AT&T’s network, as a consumer’s lawsuit claims?

Two Geniuses, One Phone Call

The first problem I encountered with my new iPhone 3G was trying to send and receive e-mail. The iPhone’s Mail program would work correctly for a day or two. Then, inexplicably, the spiral that appears at the bottom of the Mail program’s screen, next to “Checking for mail,” would spin endlessly.

I decided to seek help at the Genius Bar in San Francisco’s Union Square Apple store. Apple’s Genius Bar is a free, by-appointment tech support service, located in its stores.

I arrived early but had to wait about 10 minutes past my scheduled appointment time. I explained my problem to the Genius. He tinkered with my iPhone’s e-mail account settings, but the problem–which was now constant–remained. After about 10 minutes, he shrugged and suggested I call AT&T and check my iPhone 3G’s Mail settings for my e-mail with them.

Before I proceed, a note of clarification is in order here. My primary ISP is AT&T, the landline phone company, not the AT&T wireless division that provides data and cell phone service to iPhones. I get my home-office DSL service and e-mail account from the AT&T landline/Internet division. I was trying to use my iPhone 3G to check e-mail sent to that account.

I called AT&T’s tech support for DSL customers but they couldn’t help. So I made a second Genius Bar appointment, this time at San Francisco’s Chestnut Street store, which is smaller and less busy than the Union Square location.

If restoring using backup didn’t work (it didn’t), the Genius said I should restore the iPhone without the backup. And if that didn’t work, I could bring the phone back to the store for a swap.

My next move was to call Apple’s toll-free support line. The technician I spoke to understood my problem right away. He believed the iPhone’s Mail program wasn’t syncing correctly with Microsoft Outlook on my Vista PC, to which I had been syncing the iPhone’s e-mail settings, contacts, and calendar. I asked him to e-mail me the steps he recommended to resolve the problem. His solution worked.

On the iPhone, delete all e-mail accounts.

Reset the iPhone’s network settings (Settings, General, Reset, Reset Network Settings).

Disable Wi-Fi. (Some e-mail accounts don’t work properly if set up the first time with Wi-Fi in use, the technician explained).

On the iPhone, manually re-add e-mail accounts. He suggested I select Yahoo from the ISP options when setting up my AT&T/Yahoo e-mail account on the iPhone.

In iTunes, disable e-mail syncing with my iPhone.

A Second E-Mail Challenge

From that point, I enjoyed several weeks without any further e-mail problems. However, another issue developed, this time relating to the passcode to my AT&T/Yahoo e-mail account.

The passcode for that e-mail account contains six characters. During my initial iPhone setup, I had entered the passcode to my AT&T/Yahoo e-mail account. At that time, the iPhone validated the address and passcode; everything seemed fine. However, sometime after I had resolved the e-mail problem I described earlier, I received a warning that my e-mail passcode was incorrect.

I went back to Settings, Mail, Contacts, Calendars and retyped the correct passcode for my e-mail account. The iPhone validated my address and passcode, and all was fine … until I received the incorrect password warning again, a day later. I returned to Settings, Mail, Contacts, Calendars again and noticed the iPhone had changed my passcode from 6 to 8 characters. I retyped the correct passcode, the e-mail flowed without problems, and then–you guessed it–I was told the passcode was incorrect. I installed Apple’s iPhone 2.0.2 software, hoping that might fix the bug, but it didn’t. Finally, I deleted this account from my iPhone and manually added it again. So far, I’ve had no further e-mail problems.

Mobile Computing News, Reviews & Tips

Upgrade Hard Drive, Lose Mind: PC World’s Lincoln Spector will probably never want to upgrade a laptop hard drive again, given the harrowing experience he recounted. Lincoln mentions a device that proved to be a lifesaver: the Bytecc USB 2.0 Drive Mate, which retails for about $20. Basically, the Drive Mate lets you turn an internal hard drive into an external drive, connected via USB to another computer. I’ve used the Drive Mate myself, to copy files from the hard drive of otherwise dead laptops, and I highly recommend buying one. You never know when you’ll need to rescue files from a laptop that’s otherwise out of commission.

MSI ‘s Hardy But So-So Mini Notebook: MSI’s Wind NB U100 ($550) is an Intel Atom-based mini-notebook with 1GB of RAM, an 80GB 2.5-inch hard drive, and Windows XP. The Wind is small and fairly light, and it’s sturdy. But it comes with virtually no bundled software, and battery life was only 2 hours, 24 minutes in our tests.

Contributing Editor James A. Martin offers tools, tips, and product recommendations to help you make the most of computing on the go. Martin is also author of the Traveler 2.0 blog. Sign up to have the Mobile Computing Newsletter e-mailed to you each week.

Suggestion Box

Concept Part 1: Watchos 8 Could Introduce New Apps, New Faces, And Widgets

We’re about six months away from the unveiling of the next version of watchOS. We haven’t heard any rumors yet, so all of these ideas are based purely on conjecture. But at the end of the day, there are lots of ways that watchOS could be improved. From more detailed health data metrics to even more glanceable information, Apple has plenty of opportunities to make watchOS more powerful.

At the heart of this concept is a focus on adding new apps and turning existing components of the system into standalone apps. Perhaps the most important functionality of Apple Watch is its extensive array of health sensors. At the moment, each core health capability has its own app. But there’s really no way to go through previous health data or look at a more comprehensive overview.

Health App

Apple really ought to add the Health app to watchOS in an effort to turn the watch into a more powerful and independent health device. Each existing app for measuring different health metrics would still exist, but to see historical health data or all of today’s data in one place you could use the new Health app.

You’d be able to look at highlights that normally only appear on your iPhone, as well as each individual category and health metric. This means you’d be able to look at data you currently can’t directly on your watch.

Solar + Astronomy Apps

Two of the most beautiful watch faces on Apple Watch also happen to be super powerful. In fact they essentially function like standalone apps. But neither is very discoverable. Both of these faces also don’t allow much room for complications and as a result aren’t used very often.

Apple could split these off into two new individual apps. The Solar app could introduce an easy way to see the place of the sun throughout the day using the same exact graph design as the Solar Graph watch face. The Astronomy app could let you view the current moon phase, the position of Earth and play around with the orbit of the solar system.

Both of these watch faces would stick around, but by adding two new apps with these features more folks could use them more often.

Widgets in Control Center

Apple offered something called “glances” in the first two versions of watchOS. Originally they were intended to display quick bits of important information from third-party apps. But once developers were able to make more powerful native apps and once the watch had a more powerful processor, they weren’t necessary. Apple opted to replace them with a single Control Center overlay. They left the quick glanceable information to complications and apps in your dock.

iOS 14’s small widget size class is a perfect candidate for the Apple Watch. Apple ought to consolidate the Control Center into a single, non-scrollable page and add horizontal scrolling between various widgets. The user interface bears a striking resemblance to glances, but these widgets would be far more powerful and much faster at reloading.

Apple could even make it possible to simply port your existing iOS 14 widgets to the Watch without a standalone app. The data could sync from the web or your iPhone. This could help get more third-party software on the watch with interest in developing full Apple Watch apps at a lull.

Fun New Faces

Apple TV+ has really blown up over the past year and some of its characters have become especially beloved. A new incentive for signing up for the service could be a new “TV+” face that brings characters from your favorite shows to life on your watch. Snoopy could float around your watch face, Ted Lasso could give you a smile, characters from Central Park could sing, the possibilities are endless. It could display quotes and affirmations from these characters as well through a custom complication.

I would fully expect a Ted Lasso watch face to be a huge hit amongst Apple fans. And paired with his optimistic quotes, it could be a really delightful new watch face.

Batteries App

One of the best widgets in iOS 14 is the batteries widget. It beautifully displays the current battery level on your connected devices. While it’s great on iPhone, it could be even more useful to have on Apple Watch.

To make it even more powerful, it could let you turn things like low power mode on remotely. It’d simply be a great way to keep an eye on your connect devices. Plus, the more powerful battery widget from iOS 14 could be added to the new control center.

Hiking App

With an ever more quarantined world, it’s important that we spend some time exploring the great outdoors and getting some fresh air. With the new Hiking app you could learn about the trails and places you visit, find guides to new places, and keep track of your location while hiking.

Read Part 2 of This Concept

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Economies Of Scale: Ibm And Sun Vie For The Glass House, Part 1

When Linux was ported to IBM’s venerable System/390 mainframe hardware just over a year ago, something magical happened: companies considering throwing out their mainframes started to re-examine these plans. Then IBM announced support for Linux as an integrating, unifying platform on its entire line of e-business servers, and suddenly big iron was back in vogue. The wild and wooly world of Linux geekdom got a large dose of pinstripe suit boardroom acceptance, and the hardware fashion mavens started saying, “Retro is so chic this year!” instead of, “A mainframe. How…quaint.” In short, the marriage has been a happy one so far.

A recent IBM press release highlights two reports by industry analyst groups that show substantial cost savings for Linux on big iron as compared to horizontally-scaled rack-mount server farms. Especially in the energy-starved Silicon Valley area, IBM says, the power consumption alone can cost justify deployment of a single mainframe to replace hundreds of rack servers. A report by Hurwitz Group, based in Framingham, Mass., for instance, forecasts a savings of nearly US$200,000 annually if 500 Sun UE250 servers are replaced with one of IBM’s new zSeries mainframes. These numbers are certainly enough to grab attention. The underlying issues, though, are complex, and the raw numbers don’t tell the whole story.

Mainframe hardware is not cheap, and neither is the software that controls it. While Linux itself is free or, in a commercial package, nearly so, the underlying VM operating system that allows hundreds or thousands of Linux instances to coexist is considered a costly line item even in mainframe circles. Administering System/390 Linux itself is very similar to administering Linux on other platforms, but getting the underlying mainframe systems up and running requires some specific talent that might not exist in an otherwise-Linux-only shop.

On the plus side, though, the mainframe rewards its users with reliability that redefines the word “exceptional.” Mean-time between failures (MTBF) is calculated not in hours but in decades. If downtime for an e-commerce business means thousands of dollars per minute in lost revenue, then avoiding even a few hours a year of service interruption can pay for a lot of hardware and software. That “costly” license for VM, used as a hypervisor, doesn’t look so bad when it can be amortized over five thousand (or more) individual ASP hosting customers. As with so many things, the economics of mainframe Linux are heavily dependent on the business needs of the enterprise that deploys it.

Looking at the specific issue of energy usage, for instance, the basic numbers seem simple enough. Published ratings for a Sun UE250, according to The Hurwitz Group, place its consumption at 360 watts. The corresponding figure for an IBM zSeries is 5.3 kilowatts. Hurwitz adds a 30% overhead to each of these in their calculations, to account for environmental consumption by building air conditioning equipment and lighting. Hurwitz Group’s calculations assume that one zSeries can replace 500 of the Sun machines in a typical managed hosting environment. Based on these assumptions, and an electricity cost of ten cents per kilowatt-hour, Hurwitz Group calculates a daily cost of $561 for the Sun machines and $32 for the zSeries. That becomes a difference of $193,085 over the course of a year.

Do the Numbers Add Up?

The most easily questioned number in these calculations is the assumption that one zSeries equals five hundred Sun SPARCs. Is that realistic? Rich Ptak of The Hurwitz Group says it is. “We tried to do an equivalency,” he explains. “We talked to some system integrators…with experience in both kinds of systems. We took an extremely conservative approach; we didn’t specifically tune the mainframe environment.” Recent customer profiles published by IBM and others seem to suggest that the figure of 500 is actually somewhat conservative. Telia, a European telecomm company, replaced over 700 Sun machines with one zSeries recently.

Still, McCaffrey concedes–as have other IBM sources–that the zSeries is not a good fit in certain CPU-intensive applications. Its performance strength lies not in MIPS but in I/O bandwidth. “It is application-dependent sometimes,” explains McCaffrey. “In scientific applications, for example, you won’t get the same equivalency.” But he says that business deployments at customer sites are bearing out IBM’s claims of zSeries benefits. “As ASPs grow and build their customer base,” McCaffrey asserts, “dedicated [rack mount] servers can become an expensive proposition.” An ASP hosting company that is adding twenty rack mount server per week, McCaffrey observes, rapidly becomes mired in bad economics.

From The Matterhorn Group’s Perspective

The Matterhorn Group, based in New York, approached the question of mainframe economics somewhat differently but arrived at some of the same conclusions as The Hurwitz Group. They found the power savings are indeed real, and that the break-even point in terms (only) of electricity consumption is about thirty Linux instances on the zSeries. Furthermore, Matterhorn Group’s report cites floor space savings as another significant cost reduction.

But the Matterhorn Group report also raises some counterpoints to this argument, again reinforcing the idea that these economic analyses are not trivial. The baseline platform cost in the mainframe world is larger, meaning a customer needs to be running many Linux servers right away in order to justify the initial investment. Furthermore, the performance calculations may or may not favor the zSeries, depending on the application. Mainframe disk storage arrays are designed with a different set of underlying assumptions about the needs of the environment, meaning that system integrators need to think about storage planning in a somewhat different mindset than with horizontally-scaled server farms. Finally, the use of VM as a hypervisor to support those hundreds or thousands of Linux instances means that the installation will need at least one person with a mainframe-oriented skill set.

Another, subtler, factor cited by The Matterhorn Group is the psychology of shared server environments. Even though the VM hypervisor has a decades-long track record of superb security and inter-application isolation, there is a reluctance on the part of some hosting customers to share the hardware with anyone else. Paranoia runs deep in any good system administrator, and those who purvey zSeries application or web hosting have to overcome their customers’ instinctive distrust of shared environments. If ever an operating system could be that secure, VM is probably the one. It’s simply a question of comfort level for the customers, and only time will tell how that question will be answered.

The Matterhorn Group’s report still concludes that the zSeries mainframe can be “really exciting” as an option for providers. Especially given IBM’s new dynamic licensing model, which allows customers to pay for mainframe middleware on an actual-usage basis rather than system capacity, a larger installation could realize significant savings.

Dogecoin Price Prediction: Can Doge Hit $1? Not Before Aidoge Raises $1 Million

The crypto spring and the general improvement of the situation in the crypto market influenced the rise in popularity of meme coins and the increasing demand for them. Of course, the well-known Dogecoin (DOGE) also benefited from this situation, so a slight increase in the value of this meme coin is evident. What interests investors now is whether and when Dogecoin (DOGE) will manage to reach the long-desired value of $1. As things stand, that won’t happen before the newest AI meme crypto project, AiDoge (Ai) manages to raise $1 million! AiDoge just started its presale, but judging by the interest of users to join this crypto presale, that first million will be raised faster than we hope! But, before we focus on this new promising crypto project, let’s see what is the fate of Dogecoin (DOGE), and how will this meme coin develop in the future.

What will happen with Dogecoin (DOGE) in the future?

The fact is that Dogecoin (DOGE) is experiencing a slight increase in value, but several factors are responsible for this. The general improvement of circumstances in the crypto market, the growing popularity of meme coins (the so-called “meme mania”), but also the intervention of Elon Musk who changed the Dogecoin Twitter logo, thus causing hype, and raising interest in this meme coin. However, all this is still not enough to help Dogecoin reach the value of $1 soon. So let’s take a look at the experts’ predictions, and see when Dogecoin could potentially reach this desired value.

Dogecoin Price Prediction





































Dogecoin Price Prediction shows us that DOGE will hit $1, but not before AiDoge (Ai) raises $1 million. Therefore, you should put Dogecoin (DOGE) “on hold” and invest in a crypto that shows the chances of much greater success in a much shorter time!

What will happen with AiDoge (Ai) in the future?

Judging by the achieved presale success so far (with more than $120,000 raised in just a few days), all that it provides, and the huge potential for value growth in the coming period, a great future is predicted for the latest AI meme crypto project – AiDoge (Ai). And if you are wondering why there has been so much interest in AiDoge (Ai) from the very beginning of the presale, well, there are several reasons for that.

AiDoge: a revolutionary AI-powered meme-generating platform!

First of all, it should be noted that AiDoge is a revolutionary meme platform that allows you to create high-quality, interesting, relevant, and timely memes! With AiDoge, you can quickly, easily, and simply create interesting memes, since this platform provides an AI-driven meme-generation experience for users.

The Benefits of Owning Ai Token on the AiDoge Platform

To experience all that the AiDoge platform has to offer, you need to own a native Ai token. Ai token is the main currency on the AiDoge platform, and owning this coin will bring you a handful of benefits.

First of all, you can use the Ai token for purchasing credits. In short, you can use the Ai token to buy credits that you will later spend on generating memes.

Also, you can use the Ai token for staking. AiDoge gives you the opportunity for staking, which will bring you many benefits, including daily credit rewards. Also, staking will give you exclusive access to premium features (early access to new templates, special contests, etc.).

Using Ai Tokens for Voting and Rewards on the AiDoge Platform

And finally, you can use Ai tokens for voting and rewards. Voting is one of the most interesting aspects of the AiDoge platform. Voting, whether it’s an upvote or a downvote, will give you a chance to influence the ranking of memes on the public wall. On the public wall, you will have the opportunity to see and share Ai-generated memes. Those creators whose memes are voted as the best will be rewarded with more Ai tokens!

From all this, we see that the future of memes is here and its name is AiDoge! However, these most important features of the AiDoge platform are not the only things that “force” users to opt for the Ai token. An additional reason is associated with the very positive predictions of crypto experts and crypto influencers, who expect a large increase in the value of this coin in the future. That’s why it would be wise to seize the moment and join the AiDoge presale ASAP!

Don’t miss the AiDoge (Ai) presale!

AiDoge presale has just started, and the interest of users in investing in Ai tokens is already huge! At this moment, you can buy one Ai token at a very good presale price of only $0.000026!

With more than $120,000 already raised, we can conclude that it will move to the next stage of the presale very quickly. This means that with entering the next phase, the price of the Ai token will rise to $0.0000264, so don’t wait too long, but seize this opportunity and invest on time!


Update the detailed information about Make Mine Vanilla, Part 1 on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!