Trending December 2023 # Why I Still Believe In Google Me # Suggested January 2024 # Top 18 Popular

You are reading the article Why I Still Believe In Google Me updated in December 2023 on the website Cancandonuts.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Why I Still Believe In Google Me

Google announced this week that it won’t launch a Facebook-killer social network, but would instead add a “social layer” to existing products, right? Well, not so fast.

Google CEO Eric Schmidt said this week that Google intends to add a “social component” to “Google’s core products.”

He said if Google knows who your friends are, the company can improve search quality. “Everybody has convinced themselves that there’s some huge project about to get announced next week. And I can assure you that’s not the case,” he said.

At least one site even reported the news under the headline: “Eric Schmidt: We’re Not Making A Facebook Rival.”

Really? He said that?

In fact, Schmidt didn’t say anything new at all. Let’s break down what Schmidt actually said:

• Google will make existing projects more social.

• Knowing user contacts improves search relevance.

• Google is not going to announce a huge project next week.

Schmidt’s “announcement” announced nothing. Google has been socializing services for years. Google Reader has social elements. Gmail has been Buzzified. Google Search has acquired various social elements.

Adding social elements is just what companies do nowadays. Apple even added a social component called Ping to its iTunes music service. That Google plans to do what many other companies are doing — add social features to existing services — is something anyone could have guessed.

In fact, if Google were to announce that it would never add any social elements to existing products — now that would have been truly shocking and unexpected.

Obviously Google is on a mission to improve the quality of search by sucking in contextual data. And obviously social network awareness helps the effort. Everybody already knows that. Even Schmidt said this is “obvious.”

Schmidt’s statement that Google won’t announce a big project next week technical doesn’t preclude the possibility that Google will do so week after next.

Most importantly, Schmidt did NOT say Google won’t launch a social network to compete directly with Facebook. Yet this is what reporting implies.

We still have every reason to believe Google will launch such a social network. Here’s why I still believe in a Google Me social network:

As Facebook proved with its deadly combination of walled garden destination site with “Like” buttons sprinkled all over the Internet, the killer strategy is social everywhere combined with a specific destination site.

A social layer on top of conventional services is compelling, but many ordinary users want a service that feels like a “private space” to interact with loved ones and friends. Facebook dominates the social scene for a very short list of reasons, and one of these is that it feels closed, which it is, and that it feels private, which it is not.

Google does not have a constitutional opposition to a closed social network, as the continued existence, support and improvement of the Orkut social network proves. Google has demonstrated many times, most recently with Wave, that it won’t hesitate to kill services that don’t achieve the company’s objectives. Yet the company has recently overhauled and improved Orkut.

I believe Google has decided internally to build a Facebook-killer social network site, and will wait until it has all the pieces in place before announcing anything. However, even if I’m wrong about this, there’s no reason Google wouldn’t change its strategy later. What Google will never do is give up and cede control of the Internet to Facebook.

Until this week, the consensus rumor was that Google would launch a Facebook-killer social network called Google Me. And nothing has happened this week to disprove that rumor.

Of course, nobody knows what Google or any company will do in the future. But I still believe in Google Me.

You're reading Why I Still Believe In Google Me

Why Do I Need Underscores In Swift?

In Swift, underscores have many different uses for a different purposes. Here are some examples.

Ignore unnecessary loop variables or return values.

Absence of identifiers for external parameters in function calls.

Even if they were initially specified as constants, making variables changeable.

Ignoring tuple components or using discard values when managing errors.

To Ignore a Value

To ignore a value that a function or method returns in Swift, use an underscore. You could compose something like this, for instance, if you only worry about an operation’s success or failure. This is the most common case you use in your code.

Syntax if _ = someFunction() { } else { } Example

In this example, the greetingMessage() function returns a string value, but we’re ignoring it by using an underscore in the conditional statement. Instead, we’re just checking whether the function succeeded or failed based on whether it returned a value or not.

import Foundation return "Good morning, (fullName)" } if let _ = greetingMessage(fullName: "Alex Murphy") { print("Function successfully executed.") } else { print("Function failed to execute.") } Output Function successfully executed. To Omit External Parameter Names

In Swift, you can use an underscore to omit the external parameter names for a function or method. This concept is widely used in iOS applications. For example, if you have a function like this −

syntax func doSomething(_ value: Int) { } Example

In this example, the greetingMessage() function takes a string parameter named fullName, but we’re omitting the external parameter name by using an underscore in the function declaration. When we call the function, we just provide a string value without specifying the parameter name.

import Foundation return "Good morning, (fullName)" } if let _ = greetingMessage("Alex Murphy") { print("Function successfully executed.") } else { print("Function failed to execute.") } Output Function successfully executed. To Make a Variable Mutable

In Swift, you can use an underscore to make a variable mutable. For example, if you have a constant like this −

Example

In this example, we’re creating a mutable variable called x by adding an underscore before its name. We’re initializing it with the value of x, which is a constant. We’re then adding 10 to x and printing its value. Since _x is mutable, we can modify its value even though it was originally derived from a constant value.

import Foundation let x = 42 var _x = x _x += 10 print(_x) Output 52 Ignoring a Loop Variable

You can ignore the variable while performing anything using a loop.

Example

In this example, we’re using an underscore to ignore the loop variable in a for loop. We’re simply iterating over the numbers array and incrementing the sum variable for each element in the array. Since we don’t need to use the loop variable (which would normally be an integer index), we can use an underscore to indicate that we’re ignoring it.

import Foundation let numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] var sum = 0 for _ in numbers { sum += 1 } print("Number of elements: (sum)") Output Number of elements: 5 Ignoring Part of a Tuple

A tuple contains multiple values together. In order to use the specific values, you can ignore the part of a tuple.

Example

In this example, we’re using an underscore to ignore the y component of a tuple. We’re then using pattern matching to extract the x and z components of the tuple and assign them to local variables. Since we don’t need the y component, we can use an underscore to ignore it.

import Foundation let point = (x: 10, y: 20, z: 30) let (x, _, z) = point print("All values: (point)") print("x: (x), z: (z)") Output All values: (x: 10, y: 20, z: 30) x: 10, z: 30 Ignoring a Throw Value

While you use the do-catch statement to manage the errors in your code, you can ignore the thrown value.

Example

In this example, we’re using an underscore to ignore the error that might be thrown by the doSomething() function. We’re calling the function inside a do block and using a catch block to handle any errors that might be thrown. Since we don’t care about the specific error value, we can use an underscore to ignore it and just print a generic failure message.

import Foundation return 42 } do { let result = try doSomething() print("Success: (result)") } catch _ { print("Failure") } Output Success: 42 When Using Underscores in Swift, Keep the Following Extra Considerations in Mind

Underscoring is not required. Code can frequently be written without underlining and still produce the same results. However, using underscores can help you write more legible and succinct code.

If you use underscores overly or improperly, your code may become more difficult to comprehend. For instance, using an underscore to hide a crucial mistake number in a function call may result in errors or strange behavior.

Underscores can have different meanings based on the situation in which they are used. For instance, an underscore used in a switch expression as a wildcard pattern and one used to ignore a loop variable have distinct meanings.

Underscores can be combined with other language features to create powerful abstractions. For example, combining underscores with closure syntax can create very concise and readable code.

Underscores are not specific to Swift and are used in many other programming languages for similar purposes.

Conclusion

It is possible to make your code more concise and easier to read by using underscores, especially when you don’t need to use a specific value or parameter name. It’s important to use underscores judiciously and avoid using them in a way that might complicate your code. Using underscores in your code should make the code clearer and easier to maintain, as is the case with any language feature.

Why I Dropped My Best Friend On Facebook

Why I dropped My Best Friend on Facebook

I dropped my best friend from my Facebook friends list. When I say best friend, I really mean it. I’ve known him longer than anyone I still see regularly, since middle school. I have other friends who I see more, and with whom I’m just as close, but my friend Dave has been my best friend since High School. We live a couple thousand miles apart, so Facebook was a great way for us to stay in touch. Still, I had to cut him.

He was the best man at my wedding. He gave a classic best man speech, the awful kind. He told my entire family that I had gotten a speeding ticket on the way to my bachelor party two nights earlier. It doesn’t sound like a big deal, but I have a history with speeding tickets. I mean, there have been warrants. I’ve been arrested. Now that I’m an adult, and I pay for my own car and my own car insurance, I feel the right to not tell my parents about my speeding tickets. But Dave called me out.

I was the best man at his wedding, too. For weeks before hand, I taunted him with hints about what my speech would be like. I’m not going to repeat what I told him I’d say, but the word “tiny” figured prominently. I shouldn’t have taunted him. His wife works for a congressman, and I was excited to be giving a speech in front of a Representative that I respected and admired. They waited until the congressman was gone before they handed me a microphone. My speech was actually heartwarming, pleasant and a little funny. It was about fishing. I made it up on the spot.

That’s not why I dropped him; I just wanted to offer some background. We didn’t get into a fight, either. We’ve only been in one real fight. It was a day off from camp. You only get one or two days off per month-long session. He wanted to do laundry. I wanted to hang out with my girlfriend. We started yelling at each other in the middle of the mall in Columbia, Md. It’s a nice suburb, and they weren’t ready for the kind of language we used. We were kicked out of the food court. The whole thing was funny enough that we just laughed, and the fight was over.

You’d think I’d be able to laugh it off, but I couldn’t stand being his Facebook friend any more. Right now, you might be thinking about someone on Facebook who annoys you. Someone who you want to drop, but don’t for some reason or another. Someone who posts too many announcements about her Café World progress. Not even Farmville. Café World. My kindergarten teacher is way too into Café World, but I don’t have the heart to cut her. She’s a really nice person.

I’ve cut people on Facebook for plenty of reasons. I’ve cut former students for using horrible grammar. I was an English teacher, what can I say? I’ve cut people for getting too religious on me. I have nothing against religion, but some people get excessive with the bible quoting, at least for my spiritual needs.

I’ve cut people when I realized, after a few months, that I don’t really know who they are, even though their name sounds familiar. So, I no longer want to hear about their horse training sessions or read their quotes from “Psych.” That show is lame. Also, if you quote Craig Ferguson, you’re out. I know, he has his moments, but none of them are worth repeating.

I cut people who promote themselves on Facebook, and that’s all they do. Mostly friends who are aspiring actors, musicians or comedians. Comedians are the worst. I can’t count how many times I’ve been invited to comedy shows at little basement clubs in the East Village. I live in Dallas. Stop inviting me. I didn’t come to your show when I lived in New York City. I won’t add comedians any more. Not unless they get really famous, and people will think I’m cool if I know them. That ain’t happening.

That’s not why I cut Dave. It was politics. I don’t mean I made a political decision, I mean national politics. Republicans versus Democrats. I don’t mind getting a little political on Facebook. If you have a problem with my way of thinking, politically, I don’t need to be your Facebook friend. I have friends who take many different sides: left, right, center and libertarian, whatever those people are. I like a good argument. Dave and I agree when it comes to politics.

Dave’s friends, however, are a different story. One in particular. He is one of those morons who argues incessantly without considering any logical or moral opposition to what he says. He quotes the cable news pundits word for word, and can cite many sources for his argument, usually from blogs I’ve never heard of.

Sure, I could just ignore him, but that would defeat the purpose of Facebook. I didn’t add friends just to ignore them. I want the conversation. I want the back-and-forth.

I asked Dave how he knew this troll.

“He’s a dude who lived on my hall freshman year of college. He got kicked out when they found drugs in his room. I haven’t talked to him since then.”

A dude he hasn’t talked to in 17 years. A guy who got kicked out of college for drugs. Do you know how hard it is to get kicked out of college for drugs? It’s very, very hard.

I asked Dave to drop him. It was a very weird conversation. I was basically asking my best friend to stop talking to someone else because I didn’t like him. But here’s my logic: If Dave threw a party every weekend, and this guy was always there, spouting his nonsense and offending other people, eventually I would stop going to those parties. Eventually, everyone would stop going. I was basically saying that I didn’t like hanging around with Dave on Facebook because of the people he associates with. I thought that was legitimate.

Dave wouldn’t drop him. He cited the First Amendment. The dude can say what he wants, and Dave would feel weird dropping someone because of what he says. I punched plenty of holes in that argument, then I gave Dave an ultimatum. Him or me. Dave wouldn’t drop him, and I don’t make a threat if I’m not going to carry through.

I dropped Dave.

I’d like to say this has the sort of happy ending you’re expecting. I’d like to say that dropping Dave actually brought us closer together. That I stopped lumping him in with all the other people whose updates I read daily on Facebook, and started treating him more like the best friend that he is. That we got closer because of this. But that didn’t happen.

I’m friends with Dave’s parents on Facebook. I’m friends with his sister, who is years older than us and was never really my friend. I have 350+ friends on Facebook, and Dave and I share 72 friends in common. 20% of my friends are his friends. Dave is also friends with an obnoxious troll, so on Facebook, at least, Dave is not my friend any more.

I Hate Android: Why? – By A Hardcore Android Lover!

Like millions of people around the world, I am an Android fanboy. Recently I though about sharing some of my aspects which I don’t like about Android. Eventhough being Android has gotten better over the years but there are still many things I dont like about it. To put it bluntly, I hate Android, at least some of its features. I have used Linux for a few years since Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon and fell in love with the open source movement. Ive come to realize that all the hype about being open and portraying Apple and RIM as the evil closed platform was all a deception. . Theres a list(I love lists). Lets go through them. I hate some of the UI. Customization is nice but it allows for more things to break. These include themes and design. At first, the UI was cool and beautiful. I felt like I had a computer in my hands, literally. Icons were nice to touch and scrolling was smooth(at first). After using it for a while, I started to experience the pains of using the touch screen. Mistypes, and mistaps were frequent. The Android experience varied depending on manufacturer. All the different flavors of Android pushed by their respective hardware developers all look different. OneUI, TouchWiz, and MotoBlur are all different. OneUI is probably the best(IMO) out of all these. TouchWiz makes me feel like Im using an iPhone and MotoBlur is a mess with all their social networking widgets. These skins load on top of Android making it slower than its vanilla stock core. When I get my phone, I hate all the bloatware that comes with it. All carriers seem to do it. They push Vcast, SprintTV and other bloatware that I dont want. The Chinese manufacturers Xiaomi,Oppo,Vivo are the notorious ones feeding bloatware just to compnsate for the cheap price they offer in some countries. Not only that, but I hate that I cant delete them. I hate knowing that they are on my phone and the only way for me to get rid of them is by rooting my phone. Why do I have to jump through hoops just to get rid of this crapware? Im not scared of rooting my phone. In fact, Ive done so and install a few custom ROMs but there is always a risk of bricking your phone and leaving it useless. Average users dont want to risk the warranty by rooting their phone. Not only are there crapware on the phone, but there is/was malware on the Market. I hate Andoid memory management, being an old Symbian OS user.Symbian was the most efficient Mobile Os in memory management, followed by iOS. My old Nokia 808 Pureview had just 512MB RAM which was handling the Mammoth Camera, the 41MP beast with Xenon flash. I know that comparing a Symbian Phone with very limited apps and strict developer requirements with Android which has an ocean of apps and simpler developer standards is not fair. But are these crazy RAM of 12GB,16GB etc etc in many high end Android Phones really necessary? Or are they worth the performance they offer compared to iOs? Expanding from the 1st and the 3rd reasons, I hate Androids software fragmentation. I hate that Motorola’s flavor is different from Samsung’s. I hate that the buttons are different in all manufacturer, and even sometimes, within the same manufacturers. And I hate that I cant install certain apps because I my phone doesnt have the latest and greatest version of Android. Notoriously all my Samsung Phones from Galaxy S3 to Galaxy S9 Plus started showing sluggishness after 1 year of usage. The problem being whenever I update an app, the hardware is not able to cope with newest software. Android isВ recognized as the open platform and that unadulterated Android experience does not come standard. It only comes standard on Googles Nexus phones and Selected flagship phones from other manufacturers. But most people dont own these flagship devices. Most people get their Droids from their carriers. Not only are these phones locked down with carrier bloatware but they are also locked down from performing specific tasks. People have gotten around this issue by a process called rooting. This grants the user superuser status allowing him to do anything he wishes with the phone. The Nexus phones are relatively easy to root but carrier phones are harder. Android phones are great if you want the phone to be your hobby, if you dont mind tinkering with the device, rooting it, or if youre just a techno buff.

Google I/O 2023: Here’s What We Expect

Google I/O 2023 is right around the corner. Google’s annual developer conference will kick off tomorrow, May 7th, at the Shoreline Amphitheatre in Mountain View and we expect the company to come with a hoard of surprises up its sleeves.

7 Announcements Expected at Google I/O 2023 1. Pixel 3a/ 3a XL

Google’s hardware plans aren’t heading in the direction the company expected it to, with Pixel 3 sales not even matching up to the Pixel 2, so it now plans to recapture the market with the launch of the much-rumored Pixel 3a. This mid-range Pixel smartphone has been mistakenly confirmed by Google on its website and the rumor mill has been hyping it ever since.

The highlight of the Pixel 3a and 3a XL will, however, be the Pixel-grade cameras, which Google is said to be porting from its flagship Pixel 3. You would get the Pixel Visual Core chip, with the company’s software perks and Night Sight for about half the flagship price with this device.

There’s no info on the Indian pricing of the Pixel 3a and 3a XL, which is important as the same will decide whether these mid-range smartphones will be able to survive amid the slew of competitively priced phones.

2. Stable Android Q Beta

While the next flavor of Android is usually the highlight of Google I/O, it’ll most likely be overshadowed by the company’s hardware launch this time around. We’ve already seen two Android Q beta releases over the past couple of months, giving a brief look at what Google is bringing to Android, but the company will detail all the new features on stage during the keynote tomorrow.

The developers, on the other hand, could look forward to more info on scoped storage, optimizations for folding smartphones, ART, ANGLE and Neural Networks API.

3. Nest Hub Max

Apart from the Pixel 3a, Google is expected to unveil another hardware product at I/O 2023. It’s the Nest Hub Max, which will be a new addition to the company’s Assistant-backed Home smart displays lineup but possibly under the Nest brand name.

Google is basically going to slap a massive 10.1-inch screen on its powerful Home Max smart speaker, giving users the ability to visualize the replies to their commands, make Duo video calls and more. It’s another product that Google mistakenly listed on its own website, but the relation to the Nest branding is unclear at the moment.

4. Google Assistant

Google Duplex, the feature where Assistant could book appointments on your behalf can get an upgrade and expand beyond the confines of the United States.

5. Stadia

Google’s cloud-based game streaming service, Stadia, launched back in March to much fanfare. It enables users to stream AAA game titles in Chrome browser on any mobile device, TV, computer and other devices from Google’s servers.

6. Android Automotive

A lot of you, I bet, would have heard of Android Auto. It’s a feature that comes baked in many four-wheelers and enables you to project a revamped Android interface from your smartphone to a display on the car’s infotainment system. However, Google is looking to change that with Android Automotive OS, which is a full-fledged Android-based OS which will be installed on your car’s infotainment system.

Android Automotive OS was recently demoed running on Volvo Polestar 2, which will be the first vehicle to officially launch with the OS in tow. It’s much different from the Android Auto we know, so we can expect to learn more about it at I/O 2023.

7. Android Wear, Android TV & More

In addition, there are a number of other operating systems, apps, and features that the company could shed light upon at its developer conference. Android Wear recently got a tiles feature, so we expect to learn about more such features that make the platform lot more user-friendly.

SEE ALSO: Pixel 3a: All the Colors and Features are Here

Why Can I Snapchat Someone But Not See Their Score?

Wondering why you can Snapchat someone but not see their snap score?

Or why can’t you see someone’s snapchat score even though you’re friends?

It can be confusing because you might be able to send snaps to someone, but you can’t see their score.

Moreover, you might be able to see some people’s scores, but not others.

A misconception is that if you’re about to send a snap to someone on Snapchat, you should be able to see their snap score.

However, this is not always the case.

This is because there are a lot of other factors that come into play other than the fact that you can send snaps to the person.

In this article, you’ll learn why you can Snapchat someone but not see their score.

By the end of the article, you should be able to know why you’re not able to see some people’s snap scores and the answers to other frequently asked questions.

Why Can I Snapchat Someone But Not See Their Score?

If you can Snapchat someone but not see their score, it either means that the person didn’t add you back, or they removed you as a friend.

The snap score is only shown if both parties added each other as a friend.

As long as one person didn’t add the other as a friend on Snapchat, both parties won’t be able to see each other’s score.

You can only see someone’s Snapchat score if you’re friends with them.

In addition, they must not have removed or blocked you.

If they removed you as a friend, you won’t be able to see their score because Snapchat will automatically hide it from you.

Similarly, if someone were to block you on Snapchat, you will automatically be removed as a friend, and their profile will be hidden from you.

Here are all of the reasons in detail.

1. They didn’t add you back

The first reason why you can Snapchat someone but not see their score is because the person didn’t add you back as a friend.

The person’s snap score will be hidden from you if they didn’t add you back on Snapchat.

If the person didn’t add you back, you won’t be able to see their Snapchat score.

Even if you are able to send snaps to them, their snap score will be hidden from you unless they add you back.

Additionally, there will be a grey arrow/chat box that says “pending” beside it.

That’s when you’ll know that they didn’t add you.

Let’s say that you’ve recently added someone on Snapchat and you sent a snap to them.

If they didn’t add you back, their snap score will not be listed under their username.

However, if they added you back, their snap score will be shown on their profile.

So, if you want to be able to see the person’s score, you need to wait for them to add you back on Snapchat.

Otherwise, it’ll be hidden for as long as they don’t.

2. They removed you as a friend

If the person removed you as a friend, you won’t be able to see their Snapchat score.

When someone removes you as a friend on Snapchat, their Snapchat score will be hidden from you.

This is a common reason why can’t see their score.

This is one of the more common reasons why you can Snapchat (send snaps to) someone but not see their score.

A misconception is that when someone deletes you, you won’t be able to send them snaps.

If someone deletes you, you will still be able to send them snaps.

However, the status of the snaps that you’ve sent won’t be shown as “delivered”.

In addition, there won’t be a blue arrow under their username.

Instead, there will be a grey arrow/chat box with a “pending” status beside it.

This signifies that the person has either removed you on Snapchat, unfollowed you, or didn’t add you back in the first place.

In order for you to see their snap score, the person needs to add you back on Snapchat.

Otherwise, it will be hidden from you.

If I’m blocked on Snapchat can I still see their score?

No. If you’re blocked on Snapchat, you will not be able to see the person’s score.

In fact, you won’t be able to find their profile on Snapchat at all.

If someone blocked you on Snapchat, their profile will be hidden from you.

In other words, you won’t be able to find them on Snapchat.

When someone blocks you on Snapchat, their profile will be hidden from you.

If you were to search for them on Snapchat, their profile won’t show up on the search results.

Even if you were to search for their exact username, you won’t be able to find them on Snapchat.

To prove this theory, I’ve tested this out using two separate Snapchat accounts.

I used two accounts to add each other.

Then, I blocked the second account with the first account.

When I searched for the exact username of the first account using the second account, it did not appear on the search results.

Conclusively, when someone blocks you on Snapchat, you won’t be able to find them on Snapchat.

Your previous messages and snaps with them will also be deleted.

Can you see someone’s Snapchat score if you’re not friends?

You cannot see someone’s Snapchat score if you’re not friends.

If someone removed you as a friend or didn’t add you back, their score will be hidden from you.

The Snapchat score will only be visible if both users added each other as friends.

In order for you to see someone’s score, both parties need to add each other on Snapchat.

Otherwise, the score will be hidden.

Even if you’ve added someone as a friend, you won’t be able to see their score until they add you back.

Once both parties added each other back, you will be able to see the person’s score by visiting their profile.

The score will be listed under the person’s username on their profile.

Can others see your Snapchat score?

Only your friends can see your Snapchat score (if both parties added each other).

People who you’re not friends with on Snapchat won’t be able to see your score.

Your Snapchat score is only visible to your friends.

A common misconception is that everyone can see your score on Snapchat.

This is not true as your score is not publicly displayed.

Another misconception is that anyone can see your score once they’ve added you as a friend.

Again, this is not true as you’ll only be able to see someone’s score if you added them and they accepted it.

If you rejected their friend request, your Snapchat score will be hidden from them.

Conclusion

Snapchat scores can be pretty confusing for new users, and even those who’ve been using Snapchat for a while.

The Snapchat Help Center does not provide explicit information about who can see your score as well, so it doesn’t help much.

In this article, you’ve learned why you can send snaps to someone but can’t see their score.

It also answers frequently asked questions.

In a nutshell, only those who’ve added you on Snapchat (and that you’ve accepted) can see your Snapchat score.

If you didn’t accept someone’s friend request, they won’t be able to see your score (even if they have you added).